Регистрация | Вход в службу | FAQ      [?] 
Recent | Recommended | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Group: Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group - library [35 articles]

Недавние статьи, отправленные по почте членами Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group группы
  • McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms (McHarm) for primary studies
    by P Santaguida, P Raina, A Ismaila
    posted to treatment_harms by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-09-25 15:10:39 as **
  • Commentary: Practicing on the Tip of an Information Iceberg? Evidence of Underpublication of Registered Clinical Trials in Oncology
    Oncologist (15 September 2008), theoncologist.2008-0133.
    by Scott Ramsey, John Scoggins
    posted to publication_bias by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-09-25 09:47:41 as read
  • Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 8 (10 July 2008), 45.
    by James Thomas, Angela Harden
    posted to no-tag by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-09-25 07:19:56 as ** along with 1 person RodgerKessler
  • The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol. 8 (21 May 2008), 19.
    by Ian Shrier, Jean-Francois Boivin, Robert W Platt, Russell J Steele, James M Brophy, Franco Carnevale, Mark J Eisenberg, Andrea Furlan, Ritsuko Kakuma, Mary E Macdonald, Louise Pilote, Michel Rossignol
    posted to no-tag by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-09-25 07:18:45 as ** along with 1 person kharke
  • Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 8. (August 2008), pp. 755-762.
    by Margaret Sampson, Kaveh G Shojania, Jessie Mcgowan, Raymond Daniel, Tamara Rader, Alla E Iansavichene, Jun Ji, Mohammed T Ansari, David Moher
    posted to sysrad by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-09-25 07:17:20 as ** along with 1 person kharke
  • Disagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 8 (26 June 2008), 41.
    by Frank Peinemann, Natalie Mcgauran, Stefan Sauerland, Stefan Lange
    posted to review systematic by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-08-11 02:36:01 as **
  • Of mites and men: reference bias in narrative review articles: a systematic review.
    J Fam Pract, Vol. 54, No. 4. (April 2005), pp. 334-338.
    by LM Schmidt, PC Gotzsche
    posted to no-tag by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-07-09 12:03:20 as ** along with 1 person jyuh
  • Meta-analysis Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies
    BMJ, Vol. 316, No. 7125. (10 January 1998), pp. 140-144.
    by Matthias Egger, Martin Schneider, George D Smith
    posted to internal_validity meta-analysis non-randomised_studies by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-05-12 15:39:21 as read
  • Observational Research, Randomised Trials, and Two Views of Medical Science
    PLoS Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 3. (1 March 2008), e67.
    by Jan P Vandenbroucke
    posted to adverse_events internal_validity non-randomised_studies by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-05-02 15:55:31 as read along with 2 people msampson jyuh
  • The harvest plot: a method for synthesising evidence about the differential effects of interventions
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 8 (25 February 2008), 8.
    by David Ogilvie, Debra Fayter, Mark Petticrew, Amanda Sowden, Sian Thomas, Margaret Whitehead, Gill Worthy
    posted to sysrad by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-04-14 14:47:27 as **** along with 1 person david_r_whiting
  • Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.
    Phys Ther (11 December 2007)
    by Susan Armijo Olivo, Luciana Gazzi G Macedo, Inae Caroline C Gadotti, Jorge Fuentes, Tasha Stanton, David J J Magee
    posted to appraisal critical by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-02-26 14:05:53 as *** along with 2 people jyuh kusjasherb
  • Author reply: the master-question: meta-analyses and stopped-early randomized trials--a problem
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 1. (January 2008), pp. 96-98.
    by Dirk Bassler, Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez, Matthias Briel, Deborah J Cook, PJ Devereaux, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Haresh Kirpalani, Maureen O Meade, Victor M Montori, Anna Rozenberg, Holger J Schunemann, Guyatt
    posted to no-tag by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2008-01-16 09:32:41 as **
  • Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis
    Trials, Vol. 8 (07 June 2007), 16.
    by Jayne F Tierney, Lesley A Stewart, Davina Ghersi, Sarah Burdett, Matthew R Sydes
    posted to meta-analysis time-to-event-data by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 12:55:37 as read
  • A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity
    Implementation Science, Vol. 2 (30 November 2007), 40.
    by Christopher Carroll, Malcolm Patterson, Stephen Wood, Andrew Booth, Jo Rick, Shashi Balain
    posted to external validity by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 12:12:41 as ** along with 2 people and 2 groups anthonyzwi jago Global_health_enterprise_architecture kpa-resources
  • Do health technology assessments comply with QUOROM diagram guidance? : an empirical study
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 7 (20 November 2007), 49.
    by Daniel Hind, Andrew Booth
    posted to reporting systematic_reviews by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 11:33:07 as ** along with 1 person cm1acb
  • Thiazolidinediones, deadly sins, surrogates, and elephants
    The Lancet, Vol. 370, No. 9593., pp. 1103-1104.
    by John GF Cleland, Stephen L Atkin
    posted to diabetes surrogate_outcomes trial_design by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 11:32:08 as **
  • Patient-important outcomes in diabetes--time for consensus
    The Lancet, Vol. 370, No. 9593., pp. 1104-1106.
    by Victor M Montori, Gunjan Y Gandhi, Gordon H Guyatt
    posted to diabetes surrogate_outcomes trial_design by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 11:31:50 as **
  • Non-inferiority trials are unethical because they disregard patients' interests
    The Lancet, Vol. 370, No. 9602., pp. 1875-1877.
    by Silvio Garattini, Vittorio Bertele'
    posted to non-inferiority trial_design by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 11:31:17 as **
  • Systematic reviewers neglect bias that results from trials stopped early for benefit
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 60, No. 9. (September 2007), pp. 869-873.
    by Dirk Bassler, Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez, Matthias Briel, Deborah J Cook, PJ Devereaux, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Haresh Kirpalani, Maureen O Meade, Victor M Montori, Anna Rozenberg, Holger J Schunemann, Gordon H Guyatt
    posted to early_stopping internal_validity systematic_reviews by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 11:30:50 as **
  • Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments
    PLoS Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 2. (1 February 2007), e61.
    by Isabelle Boutron, Lydia Guittet, Candice Estellat, David Moher, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Philippe Ravaud
    posted to quality_assessment systematic_reviews by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 10:41:11 as **
  • Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 7 (15 February 2007), 10.
    by Beverley J Shea, Jeremy M Grimshaw, George A Wells, Maarten Boers, Neil Andersson, Candyce Hamel, Ashley C Porter, Peter Tugwell, David Moher, Lex M Bouter
    posted to quality_assessment systematic_reviews by danielhind to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-20 10:30:32 as read along with 3 people cm1acb sbunker kusjasherb
  • Serial Tips and tricks in performing a systematic review
    British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 57, No. 545. (December 2007), pp. 999-999.
    by Sayers, Adrian
    posted to sysrad by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-12 09:30:16 as ***
  • Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines
    British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 57, No. 545. (December 2007), pp. 971-978.
    by Carlsen, Benedicte, Glenton, Claire, Pope, Catherine
    posted to qualitative review sysrad systematic by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-12 09:28:20 as ****
  • Meta-analysis in medical research: Potentials and limitations
    Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof
    by Marcel Zwahlen, Andrew Renehan, Matthias Egger
    posted to sysrad by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-12-11 13:52:58 as *** along with 1 person Gaetan
  • The use of meta-synthesis in cardiovascular nursing research.
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs, Vol. 17, No. 3. (2007), pp. 32-36.
    by AK Woodend
    posted to no-tag by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-11-16 08:05:36 as ****
  • Testing methodological developments in the conduct of narrative synthesis: a demonstration review of research on the implementation of smoke alarm interventions
    Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, Vol. 3, No. 3. (August 2007), pp. 361-383.
    by Arai, Lisa, Britten, Nicky, Popay, Jennie, Roberts, Helen, Petticrew, Mark, Rodgers, Mark, Sowden, Amanda
    posted to sysrad by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-11-15 21:19:59 as **
  • How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed
    Annu. Rev. Public Health, Vol. 28 (2007), pp. 413-433.
    by RE Glasgow, KM Emmons
    posted to external validity by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-10-21 09:57:25 as ** along with 1 person jyuh
  • A systematic review highlights threats to validity in studies of barriers to cancer trial participation
    J. Clin. Epidemiol., Vol. 60, No. 10. (2007)
    by D Fayter, C Mcdaid, A Eastwood
    posted to no-tag by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-10-21 09:53:45 as ** along with 1 person danielhind
  • A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies.
    J Clin Epidemiol, Vol. 59, No. 10. (October 2006), pp. 1040-1048.
    by G Gartlehner, RA Hansen, D Nissman, KN Lohr, TS Carey
    posted to external validity by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-10-21 09:51:39 as ** along with 2 people jyuh danielhind
  • State-of-the-Evidence Reviews: Advantages and Challenges of Including Grey Literature
    Worldviews on Evidence-based Nursing, Vol. 3, No. 2. (June 2006), pp. 55-61.
    by Benzies, M Karen, Premji, Shahirose, Hayden, K Alix, Serrett, Karen
    posted to no-tag by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-10-21 09:50:22 as ***
  • Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 6 (11 December 2006), 56.
    by Gudrun Bornhoft, Stefanie Maxion-Bergemann, Ursula Wolf, Gunver S Kienle, Andreas Michalsen, Horst C Vollmar, Simon Gilbertson, Peter F Matthiessen
    posted to external validity by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-10-21 09:43:04 as *** along with 2 people jyuh danielhind
  • Factors that can affect the external validity of randomised controlled trials.
    PLoS Clin Trials, Vol. 1, No. 1. (May 2006)
    by PM Rothwell
    posted to external validity by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-10-21 09:42:13 as ** along with 2 people lucasv1980 danielhind
  • External validity of clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction.
    Arch Intern Med, Vol. 167, No. 1. (8 January 2007), pp. 68-73.
    by PG Steg, J López-Sendón, E Lopez de Sa, SG Goodman, JM Gore, FA Anderson, D Himbert, J Allegrone, F Van de Werf,
    posted to external validity by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-10-21 09:41:39 as *** along with 2 people guardian077 danielhind
  • External validity: the neglected dimension in evidence ranking
    Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 12, No. 4. (August 2006), pp. 450-453.
    by Persaud, Navindra, Mamdani, M Muhammad
    posted to external validity by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-10-21 09:41:19 as *** along with 2 people jyuh danielhind
  • External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".
    Lancet, Vol. 365, No. 9453. (7 2005), pp. 82-93.
    by PM Rothwell
    posted to external validity by cm1acb to the group Systematic Reviews Academic Development Group on 2007-10-21 09:39:44 as *** along with 4 people jyuh lucasv1980 suizan danielhind
    • Вы можете ссылаться на эту страницу по адресу: http://www.citeulike.org/group/3275

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.