<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:22:46 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: timothee pathogenicity</title>
	<description>CiteULike: timothee pathogenicity</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/tag/pathogenicity</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/1023165"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/1023162"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/1023160"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/1023165">
    <title>Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/1023165</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Evolution Int J Org Evolution, Vol. 54, No. 1. (February 2000), pp. 51-63.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Host organisms can respond to the threat of disease either through resistance defenses (which inhibit or limit infection) or through tolerance strategies (which do not limit infection, but reduce or offset its fitness consequences). Here we show that resistance and tolerance can have fundamentally different evolutionary outcomes, even when they have equivalent short-term benefit for the host. As a gene conferring disease resistance spreads through a population, the incidence of infection declines, reducing the fitness advantage of carrying the resistance gene. Thus genes conferring complete resistance cannot become fixed (i.e., universal) by selection in a host population, and diseases cannot be eliminated solely by natural selection for host resistance. By contrast, as a gene conferring disease tolerance spreads through a population, disease incidence rises, increasing the evolutionary advantage of carrying the tolerance gene. Therefore, any tolerance gene that can invade a host population will tend to be driven to fixation by selection. As predicted, field studies of diverse plant species infected by rust fungi confirm that resistance traits tend to be polymorphic and tolerance traits tend to be fixed. These observations suggest a new mechanism for the evolution of mutualism from parasitism, and they help to explain the ubiquity of disease.</description>
    <dc:title>Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>BA Roy</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>JW Kirchner</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Evolution Int J Org Evolution, Vol. 54, No. 1. (February 2000), pp. 51-63.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-01-03T10:40:48-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2000</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Evolution Int J Org Evolution</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0014-3820</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>54</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>1</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>51</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>63</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>evolution</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pathogenicity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>resistance</prism:category>
    <prism:category>tolerance</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/1023162">
    <title>When mutualists are pathogens: an experimental study of the symbioses between Steinernema (entomopathogenic nematodes) and Xenorhabdus (bacteria).</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/1023162</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J Evol Biol, Vol. 17, No. 5. (September 2004), pp. 985-993.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this paper, we investigate the level of specialization of the symbiotic association between an entomopathogenic nematode (Steinernema carpocapsae) and its mutualistic native bacterium (Xenorhabdus nematophila). We made experimental combinations on an insect host where nematodes were associated with non-native symbionts belonging to the same species as the native symbiont, to the same genus or even to a different genus of bacteria. All non-native strains are mutualistically associated with congeneric entomopathogenic nematode species in nature. We show that some of the non-native bacterial strains are pathogenic for S. carpocapsae. When the phylogenetic relationships between the bacterial strains was evaluated, we found a clear negative correlation between the effect a bacterium has on nematode fitness and its phylogenetic distance to the native bacteria of this nematode. Moreover, only symbionts that were phylogenetically closely related to the native bacterial strain were transmitted. These results suggest that co-evolution between the partners has led to a high level of specialization in this mutualism, which effectively prevents horizontal transmission. The pathogenicity of some non-native bacterial strains against S. carpocapsae could result from the incapacity of the nematode to resist specific virulence factors produced by these bacteria.</description>
    <dc:title>When mutualists are pathogens: an experimental study of the symbioses between Steinernema (entomopathogenic nematodes) and Xenorhabdus (bacteria).</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>M Sicard</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>JB Ferdy</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>S Pagès</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>N Le Brun</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>B Godelle</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>N Boemare</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>C Moulia</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00748.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>J Evol Biol, Vol. 17, No. 5. (September 2004), pp. 985-993.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-01-03T10:34:33-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2004</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J Evol Biol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1010-061X</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>17</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>985</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>993</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>bacteriology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>microbiology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mutualism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>nematodes</prism:category>
    <prism:category>parasitology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pathogenicity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>symbiosis</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/1023160">
    <title>The regulation of pathogenicity and mutualism in Photorhabdus.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/timothee/article/1023160</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Curr Opin Microbiol, Vol. 9, No. 2. (April 2006), pp. 127-132.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Photorhabdus is a genus of insect-pathogenic bacteria that also maintains a mutualistic interaction with Heterorhabditid nematodes. Bacteria in this genus are members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and are, therefore, closely related to many important mammalian pathogens. This bacteria-nematode complex has been exploited as a biocontrol agent that is active against several insect pests. However, this model system is also uniquely placed to address important fundamental questions about pathogenicity and mutualism. Indeed, recent genetic studies have suggested that there is a significant overlap in the genetic requirements of Photorhabdus for these contrasting interactions. In addition, the identification of key regulators of pathogenicity and symbiosis only serves to highlight the similarities between Photorhabdus, a genus of bacteria that infects invertebrate hosts, and closely related mammalian enteric pathogens.</description>
    <dc:title>The regulation of pathogenicity and mutualism in Photorhabdus.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>SA Joyce</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>RJ Watson</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>DJ Clarke</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.mib.2006.01.004</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Curr Opin Microbiol, Vol. 9, No. 2. (April 2006), pp. 127-132.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-01-03T10:32:51-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Curr Opin Microbiol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1369-5274</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>127</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>132</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>bacteriology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>microbiology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>mutualism</prism:category>
    <prism:category>parasitology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pathogenicity</prism:category>
    <prism:category>regulation</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

