<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:17:12 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: zeichnendes interactive</title>
	<description>CiteULike: zeichnendes interactive</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/zeichnendes/tag/interactive</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/zeichnendes/article/1000238"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/zeichnendes/article/1000238">
    <title>Do Computers Teach Better? A Media Comparison Study for Case-based Teaching in Radiology</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/zeichnendes/article/1000238</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Radiographics, Vol. 21, No. 4. (1 July 2001), pp. 1025-1032.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A prospective study was performed to better define the role of computers in teaching radiology to medical students. Two hundred twenty-five 3rd-year students were randomly assigned to one of four groups and exposed to 10 radiology cases as well as to a voluntary weekly radiology lecture. Group A used computer-based cases with interactive elements; group B used computer-based cases without interactive elements; group C used paper-based cases with interactive elements; and group D was not exposed to the cases and served as a control group. On a multiple-choice question test, groups A, B, and C showed significant improvement (+11.2%, +15.1%, and +13.0%, respectively), whereas group D did not (+0.6%). On an image interpretation test, group A showed the most improvement (+15.7% [P &#60; .001]), followed by group B (+15.1% [P &#60; .01]) and group C (+10.2% [P &#60; .05]); group D showed no significant improvement (+8.5%). No significant differences in the learning outcome were found between the two interactive groups (computer based and paper based). Computer-based teaching with case studies (with or without interactivity) improves students' problem-solving ability in radiology.</description>
    <dc:title>Do Computers Teach Better? A Media Comparison Study for Case-based Teaching in Radiology</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Martin Maleck</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Martin Fischer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Birgit Kammer</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Claudius Zeiler</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Eugen Mangel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Franz Schenk</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Klaus-Juergen Pfeifer</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Radiographics, Vol. 21, No. 4. (1 July 2001), pp. 1025-1032.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-12-18T14:58:33-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Radiographics</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>21</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1025</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1032</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>computer-based</prism:category>
    <prism:category>education</prism:category>
    <prism:category>interactive</prism:category>
    <prism:category>learning</prism:category>
    <prism:category>performance</prism:category>
    <prism:category>radiology</prism:category>
    <prism:category>students</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

