Регистрация | Вход в службу | FAQ      [?] 

Ключевое слово expert_judgment [12 articles]

Recent papers classified by the tag expert_judgment.
  • Dynamics of Technical Controversy
    by Allan C Mazur
    posted to controversy expert_judgment expertise experts by wandall on 2007-03-31 14:20:28 as **
  • At what degree of belief in a research hypothesis is a trial in humans justified?
    J Eval Clin Pract, Vol. 8, No. 2. (May 2002), pp. 269-276.
    by B Djulbegovic, I Hozo
    posted to expert_judgment false_positive justification by wandall on 2007-03-10 11:15:48 as **
  • Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
    PLoS Medicine, Vol. 2, No. 8. (1 August 2005), e124.
    by John P Ioannidis
    posted to conflict_of_interest expert_judgment false_positive judgement registry replication statistics uncertainty by wandall on 2007-03-09 15:04:15 as read along with 7 people and 1 group hpiwowar ggorjan biomcgary devender willie_gt csgillespie gvdh FlowCytometry
  • Expert Judgment and High Level Nuclear Waste Management
    Review of Policy Research, Vol. 10, No. 4. (1991), pp. 114-126.
    by Patricia Fleming
    posted to expert_judgment risk_management by wandall on 2007-03-15 21:52:13 as **
  • The over-optimism among experts in assessment and foresight
    Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 71, No. 4. (May 2004), pp. 341-363.
    by Gunther Tichy
    posted to expert_judgment by wandall on 2006-11-09 15:23:39 as **
  • Evaluation of historical control data in carcinogenicity studies.
    Hum Exp Toxicol, Vol. 22, No. 10. (October 2003), pp. 541-549.
    by H Greim, HP Gelbke, U Reuter, HW Thielmann, L Edler
    posted to animal_studies carcinogen data expert_judgment histrorical_control by wandall on 2007-07-10 00:41:05 as **
  • Engaging Expert Peers in the Development of Risk Assessments
    Risk Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 6. (December 2007), pp. 1609-1621.
    by Patterson, Jacqueline, Bette Meek, , Strawson, E Joan, Liteplo, G Robert
    posted to expertise expert_judgment experts peer_review risk_assessment by wandall on 2007-12-19 12:41:45 as **
  • We should be designing better experiments.
    Vet Anaesth Analg, Vol. 30, No. 2. (April 2003), pp. 59-61.
    by MF Festing
    posted to animal_studies experiment experimental_design expert_judgment statistics by wandall on 2007-07-09 12:46:55 as **
  • Does Concern-Driven Risk Management Provide a Viable Alternative to QRA
    Risk Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 1. (February 2007), pp. 27-43.
    by Anthony T Cox, Louis
    posted to expert_judgment risk_assessment by wandall on 2007-03-15 22:18:13 as **
  • Acceptable regret in medical decision making.
    Med Hypotheses, Vol. 53, No. 3. (September 1999), pp. 253-259.
    by B Djulbegovic, I Hozo, A Schwartz, KM McMasters
    posted to expert_judgment false_positive judgement uncertainty by wandall on 2007-03-10 11:08:02 as **
  • The need for statistical analysis of rodent micronucleus test data. Comment on the paper by Ashby and Tinwell.
    Mutat Res, Vol. 329, No. 2. (July 1995), pp. 221-224.
    by MF Festing, DP Lovell
    posted to animal_studies expert_judgment statistics by wandall on 2007-07-09 12:43:27 as **
  • A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction.
    JAMA, Vol. 268, No. 2. (8 July 1992), pp. 240-248.
    by EM Antman, J Lau, B Kupelnick, F Mosteller, TC Chalmers
    posted to expert_judgment judgement rct by wandall on 2007-03-10 13:56:59 as **
    • Вы можете ссылаться на эту страницу по адресу: http://www.citeulike.org/tag/expert_judgment

    RIS BibTeX RSS
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.