Latency of locating lights and sounds

@article{citeulike:2754906, abstract = {Tested the hypothesis that auditory localization processes are more complex than visual localization processes in 3 experiments with 58 undergraduates. Stimulus azimuth and auditory intensity were varied as was response mode key pressing or verbalization ("right," "left"). RT for localization was compared against simple RT control data. Analyses of mean RT and variability of RT support the hypothesis. Giving S foreknowledge of the modality of a stimulus affected simple and localization RTs equally, indicating that stimulus uncertainty did not affect localization per se. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)}, author = {Simpson, W. E. }, citeulike-article-id = {2754906}, doi = {10.1037/h0032449}, journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology}, keywords = {multimodal}, month = {April}, number = {1}, pages = {169--175}, posted-at = {2008-05-05 03:36:41}, priority = {2}, title = {Latency of locating lights and sounds}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0032449}, volume = {93}, year = {1972} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:2754906 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2754906 TI - Latency of locating lights and sounds JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology VL - 93 IS - 1 SP - 169 EP - 175 N2 - Tested the hypothesis that auditory localization processes are more complex than visual localization processes in 3 experiments with 58 undergraduates. Stimulus azimuth and auditory intensity were varied as was response mode key pressing or verbalization ("right," "left"). RT for localization was compared against simple RT control data. Analyses of mean RT and variability of RT support the hypothesis. Giving S foreknowledge of the modality of a stimulus affected simple and localization RTs equally, indicating that stimulus uncertainty did not affect localization per se. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved) KW - multimodal AU - Simpson, WE PY - 1972/04// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0032449 ER -