Регистрация | Вход в службу | FAQ      [?] 
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

cyrille citation-databases [25 articles]

Recent papers added to cyrille library classified by the tag citation-databases. You can also see everyone's citation-databases.
  • Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century--A review
    Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 2, No. 1. (January 2008), pp. 1-52.
    by Judit Bar-Ilan
    posted to bibliometrics citation-analysis citation-databases infometrics by cyrille on 2008-04-15 12:43:26 as ** along with 3 people RafG ssn bigbossman
  • Do we need a Unique Scientist ID for publications in biomedicine?
    Biomedical Digital Libraries, Vol. 2, No. 1. (2005)
    by Andreas B Lang, Elke Lang
    posted to bibliometrics citation-analysis citation-databases by cyrille on 2008-03-28 08:13:53 as ** along with 3 people hpiwowar ggriff avivagabriel
  • Benchmarking Google Scholar with the New Zealand PBRF research assessment exercise
    Scientometrics
    by Alastair Smith
    posted to bibliometrics citation-analysis citation-databases google-scholar by cyrille on 2008-02-25 07:55:10 as ** along with 1 person karipuf
  • Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines
    Scientometrics, Vol. 74, No. 2. (29 February 2008), pp. 273-294.
    by Kayvan Kousha, Mike Thelwall
    posted to citation-analysis citation-databases google-scholar by cyrille on 2008-02-25 07:53:56 as **
  • Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar
    Scientometrics, Vol. 74, No. 2. (29 February 2008), pp. 257-271.
    by Judit Bar-Ilan
    posted to bibliometrics citation-analysis citation-databases google-scholar scopus web-of-science by cyrille on 2008-02-25 07:50:55 as ** along with 3 people jronallo bigbossman karipuf
  • Using Scopus to Analyze Citations
    pp. 59-61.
    by Kimberly Hill
    posted to citation-analysis citation-databases scopus by cyrille on 2007-11-30 07:40:13 as ***
  • A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar
    (23 Dec 2006)
    by Lokman I Meho, Kiduk Yang
    posted to bibliometrics citation-analysis citation-databases google-scholar scopus web-of-science by cyrille on 2007-11-23 15:03:58 as **** along with 2 people ansobol Carol_Perryman
  • Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 58, No. 13. (2007), pp. 2105-2125.
    by Lokman I Meho, Kiduk Yang
    posted to citation-analysis citation-databases database-evaluation google-scholar web-of-science by cyrille on 2007-11-23 15:01:32 as **** along with 3 people A_Olympia amarois gruger
  • An exploratory study of Google Scholar
    Online Information Review, Vol. 31, No. 6. (2007), pp. 814-830.
    by Philipp Mayr, Anne-Kathrin Walter
    posted to citation-databases database-evaluation google-scholar by cyrille on 2007-11-23 14:46:03 as **** along with 2 people amarois JSicot
  • Use Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science for Comprehensive Citation Tracking
    Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, Vol. 2, No. 3. (2007)
    by Lorie A Kloda
    posted to citation-analysis citation-databases google-scholar scopus web-of-science by cyrille on 2007-11-14 15:34:34 as *****
  • Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
    Biomedical Digital Libraries, Vol. 3 (29 June 2006), 7.
    by Nisa Bakkalbasi, Kathleen Bauer, Janis Glover, Lei Wang
    posted to citation-analysis citation-databases google-scholar scopus web-of-science by cyrille on 2007-11-14 15:31:39 as ** along with 10 people dullhunk lmichan rabourn leonardo hpiwowar ckeene scholze amarois julesyoo Torsten_Holmer
  • Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
    Biomedical Digital Libraries, Vol. 3, No. 7. (29 June 2006)
    by Nisa Bakkalbasi, Kathleen Bauer, Janis Glover, Lei Wang
    posted to citation-analysis citation-databases google-scholar scopus web-of-science by cyrille on 2006-08-02 09:44:56 as *****
  • How do we count our chickens? Or do citation counts count?
    Online Information Review, Vol. 29, No. 6. (2005), pp. 581-584.
    by GE Gorman
    posted to citation-analysis citation-databases by cyrille on 2005-12-15 11:34:56 as *****
  • The emergence of competitors to the Science Citation Index and the Web of Science
    Current Science, Vol. 89, No. 9. (10 November 2005), pp. 1531-1536.
    by Dana L Roth
    posted to citation-databases google-scholar scopus by cyrille on 2005-12-06 12:11:56 as ** along with 1 person amarois
  • As we may search – Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases
    Current Science, Vol. 89, No. 9. (10 November 2005), pp. 1537-1547.
    by Peter Jacso
    posted to citation-databases google-scholar scopus web-of-science by cyrille on 2005-12-06 12:00:59 as **
  • A comparision of the citation counts in the Science Citation Index and the NASA Astronomical System.
    Vol. 6
    by HA Abt
    edited by A Heck
    posted to citation-analysis citation-databases coverage-and-overlap web-of-science by cyrille on 2005-10-10 08:22:25 as **
  • Scientific impact quantity and quality: Analysis of two sources of bibliographic data
    (11 Apr 2005)
    by Richard K Belew
    posted to citation-analysis citation-databases coverage-and-overlap database-evaluation google-scholar web-of-science by cyrille on 2005-10-07 15:01:55 as ** along with 1 person Enro
  • How balanced is the Science Citation Index's journal coverage?: a preliminary overview of macrolevel statistical data
    (2000), pp. 251-277.
    by Tibor Braun, Wolfgang Glanzel, Andras Schubert, Blaise Cronin, Helen B Atkins
    posted to citation-databases coverage-and-overlap web-of-science by cyrille on 2005-09-29 15:09:23 as **
  • A study of users' performance and satisfaction with the Web of Science IR interface
    Journal of Information Science, Vol. 30, No. 5. (2004), 459.
    by SMZ Ahmed, C Mcknight, C Oppenheim
    posted to citation-databases user-interface web-of-science by cyrille on 2005-09-21 07:10:38 as **
  • An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment
    D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 11, No. 9. (2005)
    by Kathleen Bauer, Nisa Bakkalbasi
    posted to citation-analysis citation-databases google-scholar scopus web-of-science by cyrille on 2005-09-19 07:39:32 as ** along with 6 people and 5 groups Enro xxc Bonaria valeriabaudo JeffreyDemaine JSicot Blog_and_Wiki_Research Librarians Wikipedia OpenArchive CISTI-Research
  • Review of Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus
    Charleston Advisor, Vol. 6, No. 3. (January 2005)
    by Louise F Deis, D Goodman
    posted to citation-databases scopus web-of-science by cyrille on 2005-08-23 12:50:05 as **
  • SCOPUS: Profusion and Confusion
    Online, Vol. 29, No. 2. (2005), pp. 36-38.
    by Susan Fingerman
    posted to citation-databases scopus by cyrille on 2005-08-23 12:33:18 as **
  • ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus
    Online, Vol. 28, No. 6., pp. 51-54.
    by Peter Jacso
    posted to citation-databases scopus web-of-science by cyrille on 2005-08-23 12:20:46 as **
  • KeyWords Plus
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 44, No. 5. (4 January 1999), pp. 298-299.
    by Eugene Garfield, Irving H Sher
    posted to citation-databases subject-indexing by cyrille on 2005-08-23 10:25:35 as **
  • Citation searching
    Online Information Review, Vol. 28, No. 6., 454.
    by Peter Jacso
    posted to citation-databases by cyrille on 2005-08-23 10:19:08 as ** along with 2 people mva_joshi knmnyn
    • Вы можете ссылаться на эту страницу по адресу: http://www.citeulike.org/user/cyrille/tag/citation-databases

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.