Регистрация | Вход в службу | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Generalization error for multi-class margin classification

by: Xiaotong Shen, Lifeng Wang
Electronic Journal of Statistics, Vol. 1 (2007), pp. 307-330.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

In this article, we study rates of convergence of the generalization error of multi-class margin classifiers. In particular, we develop an upper bound theory quantifying the generalization error of various large margin classifiers. The theory permits a treatment of general margin losses, convex or nonconvex, in presence or absence of a dominating class. Three main results are established. First, for any fixed margin loss, there may be a trade-off between the ideal and actual generalization performances with respect to the choice of the class of candidate decision functions, which is governed by the trade-off between the approximation and estimation errors. In fact, different margin losses lead to different ideal or actual performances in specific cases. Second, we demonstrate, in a problem of linear learning, that the convergence rate can be arbitrarily fast in the sample size $n$ depending on the joint distribution of the input/output pair. This goes beyond the anticipated rate $O(n^-1)$. Third, we establish rates of convergence of several margin classifiers in feature selection with the number of candidate variables $p$ allowed to greatly exceed the sample size $n$ but no faster than $exp(n)$.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.