Регистрация | Вход в службу | FAQ      [?] 
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

hpiwowar systematic-reviews [12 articles]

Recent papers added to hpiwowar library classified by the tag systematic-reviews. You can also see everyone's systematic-reviews.
  • How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis.
    Ann Intern Med, Vol. 147, No. 4. (21 August 2007), pp. 224-233.
    by KG Shojania, M Sampson, MT Ansari, J Ji, S Doucette, D Moher
  • Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 5. (May 2008), pp. 440-448.
    by Su Golder, Yoon Loke, Heather M Mcintosh
  • Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.
    The Medical journal of Australia, Vol. 185, No. 5. (4 September 2006), pp. 263-267.
    by AC Plint, D Moher, A Morrison, K Schulz, DG Altman, C Hill, I Gaboury
  • Optimizing search strategies to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 6 (09 May 2006), 23.
    by Li Zhang, Isola Ajiferuke, Margaret Sampson
    posted to all data-access evaluation example ir systematic-reviews by hpiwowar on 2008-03-18 17:43:50 as **
  • Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev, No. 2. (2007)
  • Predictive ability of DNA microarrays for cancer outcomes and correlates: an empirical assessment
    Lancet, Vol. 362, No. 9394. (2003), pp. 1439-44.
    by EE Ntzani, JP Ioannidis
    posted to all cancer ioannidis ntzani systematic-reviews microarrays by hpiwowar on 2006-02-23 18:37:43 as ***
  • Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: III. How did the authors synthesize the data and make their conclusions?
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, Vol. 152, No. 9. (1998), pp. 915-20.
    by D Moher, AR Jadad, TP Klassen
    posted to all systematic-reviews tutorial by hpiwowar on 2006-02-23 18:37:43 as ***
  • Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews
    Ann Intern Med, Vol. 127, No. 9. (1997), pp. 820-6.
    by J Lau, JP Ioannidis, CH Schmid
    posted to all ioannidis systematic-reviews by hpiwowar on 2006-02-23 18:37:40 as ***
  • Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: I. Getting started
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, Vol. 152, No. 7. (1998), pp. 700-4.
    by TP Klassen, AR Jadad, D Moher
    posted to all systematic-reviews tutorial by hpiwowar on 2006-02-23 18:37:38 as **
  • Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: II. How did the authors find the studies and assess their quality?
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, Vol. 152, No. 8. (1998), pp. 812-7.
    by AR Jadad, D Moher, TP Klassen
    posted to all systematic-reviews tutorial by hpiwowar on 2006-02-23 18:37:38 as **
  • Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals
    Jama, Vol. 280, No. 3. (1998), pp. 278-80.
    by AR Jadad, DJ Cook, A Jones, TP Klassen, P Tugwell, M Moher, D Moher
    posted to all evaluation meta-analysis systematic-reviews by hpiwowar on 2006-02-23 18:37:38 as **
  • Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
    Bmj, Vol. 323, No. 7306. (2001), pp. 224-8.
    by DG Altman
    posted to all evaluation markers systematic-reviews by hpiwowar on 2006-02-23 18:37:34 as ***
  • Вы можете ссылаться на эту страницу по адресу: http://www.citeulike.org/user/hpiwowar/tag/systematic-reviews

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.