Регистрация | Вход в службу | FAQ      [?] 
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

kharke standards [11 articles]

Recent papers added to kharke library classified by the tag standards. You can also see everyone's standards.
  • A comparison of OpenURL link resolvers: The results of a University of Connecticut Libraries environmental scan
    Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, Vol. 30, No. 3-4. ( 2006), pp. 179-201.
    by Jill Livingston, Deborah Sanford, Dave Bretthauer
    posted to standards eresource_management by kharke on 2008-07-31 22:32:37 as **
  • The NISO License Expression Working Group
    Serials Review, Vol. 34, No. 2. (June 2008), pp. 162-163.
    by Mark Needleman
    posted to standards eresource_management by kharke on 2008-07-23 15:09:29 as **
  • License Mapping for ERM Systems: Existing Practices and Initiatives for Support
    Serials Review, Vol. 34, No. 2. (June 2008), pp. 137-143.
    by Lisa B Ruth
    posted to standards eresource_management by kharke on 2008-07-23 15:08:21 as ** along with 2 people Maltarich p0ol
  • Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study
    BMJ, Vol. 332, No. 7535. (28 January 2006), pp. 202-209.
    by Giuseppe G Biondi-Zoccai, Marzia Lotrionte, Antonio Abbate, Luca Testa, Enrico Remigi, Francesco Burzotta, Marco Valgimigli, Enrico Romagnoli, Filippo Crea, Pierfrancesco Agostoni
    posted to standards research-standards publishing-standards meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-07-11 19:25:22 as **
  • Estimating Time to Conduct a Meta-analysis From Number of Citations Retrieved, August 18, 1999, 282 (7): 634
    JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 282, No. 7. (18 August 1999), pp. 634-635.
    by E Allen, I Olkin
    posted to standards researchmethods quality meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-06-23 18:20:39 as **
  • Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.
    J Med Libr Assoc, Vol. 93, No. 1. (January 2005), pp. 74-80.
    by J McGowan, M Sampson
    posted to systematic_reviews standards researchmethods librarianship by kharke on 2008-06-11 16:31:43 as ** along with 2 people and 1 group misc8g msampson Academic Writing, Literacies and Discourse
  • Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    (February 2008)
    edited by Julian PT Higgins, Sally Green
    posted to systematic_reviews standards researchmethods publichealth by kharke on 2008-06-05 03:52:50 as **
  • Assessing the quality of research
    BMJ, Vol. 328, No. 7430. (3 January 2004), pp. 39-41.
    by Paul Glasziou, Jan Vandenbroucke, Iain Chalmers
    posted to standards researchmethods quality by kharke on 2008-06-02 22:14:19 as **
  • No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof
    by Margaret Sampson, Jessie Mcgowan, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Elise Cogo, David Moher
    posted to epidemiology publishing quality standards systematic_reviews by kharke on 2008-04-09 20:44:58 as **
  • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 4. (April 2008), pp. 344-349.
    by Erik von Elm, Douglas G Altman, Matthias Egger, Stuart J Pocock, Peter C Gotzsche, Jan P Vandenbroucke
    posted to epidemiology publishing standards by kharke on 2008-04-09 20:26:37 as ** along with 3 people and 1 group lilith misc8g jyuh 801
  • Auditing Quality of Research in Social Sciences.
    Quality & Quantity, Vol. 42, No. 2. (20080401)
    by Sanne Akkerman, Wilfried Admiraal, Mieke Brekelmans, Heinze Oost
    posted to bibliometrics quality standards by kharke on 2008-04-03 18:59:28 as **
    • Вы можете ссылаться на эту страницу по адресу: http://www.citeulike.org/user/kharke/tag/standards

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.