Visual orienting and alerting in rhesus monkeys: comparison with humans.

@article{citeulike:2739051, abstract = {The behavioral capacities of the rhesus monkey for several sensory and cognitive tasks appear quite similar to those of humans. To evaluate the monkey's attentional capacities, we have compared monkey and human performance on a visuospatial attentional task, the cued target detection (CTD) paradigm. Animals were trained to fixate a small spot of light while a cue and a subsequent target, are flashed in the visual periphery. In valid trials, the cue and target appeared in the same spatial location; in invalid trials, the cue and target appeared in the opposite location; in double trials, two cues were presented and the target appeared in one of their locations; in no-cue trials, the cue was omitted and the target appeared in one location. In addition, we varied cognitive control over the task initiation by making the trial onset either self-paced or computer-paced. Reaction times (RTs) to target presentation, response accuracy, and frequency of aborted trials were measured for all subjects. No significant species differences were found for the patterns of RTs for different trial types or for attentional dynamics, as indexed by the decreases in RT with increasing cue-target interval. However, humans and non-human primates reacted differently to changes in cognitive control. Humans shows significant increases in no-cue trial RTs in the auto-paced task compared to the self-paced, but no differences in overall RT between tasks; monkeys showed a significant faster overall RT for the self-paced than the computer-paced task, but no difference between no-cue RTs. The performance differences between species may be related to the training history of the animals or to known anatomical differences in cortical organization, especially in the parietal lobe.}, address = {Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403, USA.}, author = {Witte, E. A. and Villareal, M. and Marrocco, R. T. }, citeulike-article-id = {2739051}, issn = {0166-4328}, journal = {Behavioural brain research}, keywords = {attention, monkey, psychophysics}, month = {December}, number = {1}, pages = {103--112}, posted-at = {2008-04-30 16:56:28}, priority = {2}, title = {Visual orienting and alerting in rhesus monkeys: comparison with humans.}, url = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9021075}, volume = {82}, year = {1996} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:2739051 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2739051 TI - Visual orienting and alerting in rhesus monkeys: comparison with humans. JF - Behavioural brain research VL - 82 IS - 1 SP - 103 EP - 112 AD - Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403, USA. SN - 0166-4328 N2 - The behavioral capacities of the rhesus monkey for several sensory and cognitive tasks appear quite similar to those of humans. To evaluate the monkey's attentional capacities, we have compared monkey and human performance on a visuospatial attentional task, the cued target detection (CTD) paradigm. Animals were trained to fixate a small spot of light while a cue and a subsequent target, are flashed in the visual periphery. In valid trials, the cue and target appeared in the same spatial location; in invalid trials, the cue and target appeared in the opposite location; in double trials, two cues were presented and the target appeared in one of their locations; in no-cue trials, the cue was omitted and the target appeared in one location. In addition, we varied cognitive control over the task initiation by making the trial onset either self-paced or computer-paced. Reaction times (RTs) to target presentation, response accuracy, and frequency of aborted trials were measured for all subjects. No significant species differences were found for the patterns of RTs for different trial types or for attentional dynamics, as indexed by the decreases in RT with increasing cue-target interval. However, humans and non-human primates reacted differently to changes in cognitive control. Humans shows significant increases in no-cue trial RTs in the auto-paced task compared to the self-paced, but no differences in overall RT between tasks; monkeys showed a significant faster overall RT for the self-paced than the computer-paced task, but no difference between no-cue RTs. The performance differences between species may be related to the training history of the animals or to known anatomical differences in cortical organization, especially in the parietal lobe. KW - attention KW - monkey KW - psychophysics AU - Witte, EA AU - Villareal, M AU - Marrocco, RT PY - 1996/12// UR - http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9021075 ER -