On the psychology of 'if only': Regret and the comparison between factual and counterfactual outcomesby: Eric van Dijk, Marcel Zeelenberg
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 97, No. 2. (July 2005), pp. 152-160.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Notes for this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractPeople experience regret when they realize that they would have been better off had they decided differently. Hence, a central element in regret is the comparability of a decision outcome with the outcomes forgone. Up to now, however, the comparison process that is so essential to the experience of regret has not been the subject of psychological research. In this article, we tune in on the comparison dependency of regret. We argue that factors that reduce the tendency to compare attenuate regret, and demonstrate that uncertainty about counterfactual outcomes (Experiment 1), and incomparability of counterfactual and factual outcomes (Experiments 2 and 3) produce such effects.
BibTeX record
RIS record