WHAT EPISTEMIC VALUES SHOULD WE RECLAIM FOR RELIGION AND SCIENCE? A RESPONSE TO J. WESLEY ROBBINS

Zygon®, Vol. 28, No. 3. (1993), pp. 371-376.

View FullText article

Blackwell Synergy, DOI

Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

Notes for this article

wandall has 1 private note и ещё 0 public notes for this article. If you are wandall then you can log in to see the private note.

Find related articles from these CiteULike users

wandall

Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

epistemic_values, uinteressant

Abstract

Abstract. Postmodernism in science rejects and deconstructs the cultural dominance of especially the natural sciences in our time. Although it presents the debate between religion and science with a promising epistemological holism, it also seriously challenges attempts to develop a meaningful relationship between science and religion. A neopragmatist perspective on religion and science is part of this important challenge and eminently reveals the problems and reduction that arise when pragmatist criteria alone are used to construct a holism that renounces any demarcation between different areas of rationality. In this pragmatist vision for a holist culture, the cognitive resources of rationality are bypassed in such a way that a meaningful interaction between theology and science becomes impossible.

@article{citeulike:1210840, abstract = {Abstract. Postmodernism in science rejects and deconstructs the cultural dominance of especially the natural sciences in our time. Although it presents the debate between religion and science with a promising epistemological holism, it also seriously challenges attempts to develop a meaningful relationship between science and religion. A neopragmatist perspective on religion and science is part of this important challenge and eminently reveals the problems and reduction that arise when pragmatist criteria alone are used to construct a holism that renounces any demarcation between different areas of rationality. In this pragmatist vision for a holist culture, the cognitive resources of rationality are bypassed in such a way that a meaningful interaction between theology and science becomes impossible.}, author = {Huyssteen}, citeulike-article-id = {1210840}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01041.x}, journal = {Zygon®}, keywords = {epistemic\_values, uinteressant}, number = {3}, pages = {371--376}, posted-at = {2007-04-05 13:43:54}, priority = {0}, title = {WHAT EPISTEMIC VALUES SHOULD WE RECLAIM FOR RELIGION AND SCIENCE? A RESPONSE TO J. WESLEY ROBBINS}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01041.x}, volume = {28}, year = {1993} }

RIS record

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:1210840 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1210840 TI - WHAT EPISTEMIC VALUES SHOULD WE RECLAIM FOR RELIGION AND SCIENCE? A RESPONSE TO J. WESLEY ROBBINS JF - Zygon® VL - 28 IS - 3 SP - 371 EP - 376 N2 - Abstract. Postmodernism in science rejects and deconstructs the cultural dominance of especially the natural sciences in our time. Although it presents the debate between religion and science with a promising epistemological holism, it also seriously challenges attempts to develop a meaningful relationship between science and religion. A neopragmatist perspective on religion and science is part of this important challenge and eminently reveals the problems and reduction that arise when pragmatist criteria alone are used to construct a holism that renounces any demarcation between different areas of rationality. In this pragmatist vision for a holist culture, the cognitive resources of rationality are bypassed in such a way that a meaningful interaction between theology and science becomes impossible. KW - epistemic_values KW - uinteressant AU - Huyssteen PY - 1993/// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01041.x ER -

RIS BibTeX