Neural bases of motivated reasoning: an FMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election.

@article{citeulike:955331, abstract = {Research on political judgment and decision-making has converged with decades of research in clinical and social psychology suggesting the ubiquity of emotion-biased motivated reasoning. Motivated reasoning is a form of implicit emotion regulation in which the brain converges on judgments that minimize negative and maximize positive affect states associated with threat to or attainment of motives. To what extent motivated reasoning engages neural circuits involved in "cold" reasoning and conscious emotion regulation (e.g., suppression) is, however, unknown. We used functional neuroimaging to study the neural responses of 30 committed partisans during the U.S. Presidential election of 2004. We presented subjects with reasoning tasks involving judgments about information threatening to their own candidate, the opposing candidate, or neutral control targets. Motivated reasoning was associated with activations of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex, and lateral orbital cortex. As predicted, motivated reasoning was not associated with neural activity in regions previously linked to cold reasoning tasks and conscious (explicit) emotion regulation. The findings provide the first neuroimaging evidence for phenomena variously described as motivated reasoning, implicit emotion regulation, and psychological defense. They suggest that motivated reasoning is qualitatively distinct from reasoning when people do not have a strong emotional stake in the conclusions reached.}, address = {Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. dwesten@emory.edu}, author = {Westen, D. and Blagov, P. S. and Harenski, K. and Kilts, C. and Hamann, S. }, citeulike-article-id = {955331}, doi = {10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1947}, issn = {0898-929X}, journal = {J Cogn Neurosci}, keywords = {fmri, thinking}, month = {November}, number = {11}, pages = {1947--1958}, posted-at = {2006-11-21 15:16:42}, priority = {2}, title = {Neural bases of motivated reasoning: an FMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1947}, volume = {18}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:955331 L3 - citeulike-article-id:955331 TI - Neural bases of motivated reasoning: an FMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election. JF - J Cogn Neurosci VL - 18 IS - 11 SP - 1947 EP - 1958 AD - Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. dwesten@emory.edu SN - 0898-929X N2 - Research on political judgment and decision-making has converged with decades of research in clinical and social psychology suggesting the ubiquity of emotion-biased motivated reasoning. Motivated reasoning is a form of implicit emotion regulation in which the brain converges on judgments that minimize negative and maximize positive affect states associated with threat to or attainment of motives. To what extent motivated reasoning engages neural circuits involved in "cold" reasoning and conscious emotion regulation (e.g., suppression) is, however, unknown. We used functional neuroimaging to study the neural responses of 30 committed partisans during the U.S. Presidential election of 2004. We presented subjects with reasoning tasks involving judgments about information threatening to their own candidate, the opposing candidate, or neutral control targets. Motivated reasoning was associated with activations of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex, and lateral orbital cortex. As predicted, motivated reasoning was not associated with neural activity in regions previously linked to cold reasoning tasks and conscious (explicit) emotion regulation. The findings provide the first neuroimaging evidence for phenomena variously described as motivated reasoning, implicit emotion regulation, and psychological defense. They suggest that motivated reasoning is qualitatively distinct from reasoning when people do not have a strong emotional stake in the conclusions reached. KW - fmri KW - thinking AU - Westen, D AU - Blagov, PS AU - Harenski, K AU - Kilts, C AU - Hamann, S PY - 2006/11// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1947 ER -