Регистрация | Вход в службу | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Children's Understanding of Preexisting Differences in Knowledge and Belief

by: Scott A Miller
Developmental Review, Vol. 20, No. 2. (June 2000), pp. 227-282.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

A basic developmental task for children is to understand how people may differ in what they know and believe. Some such differences stem from situationally provided contrasts in immediate information; others reflect more pervasive, naturally occurring variations in thoughts and beliefs. This article reviews research relevant to children's understanding of the second form of cognitive difference. The paradigms reviewed include false belief, origins of knowledge, ambiguity, explicit judgments of knowledge, communication, and information seeking; the target contrasts include self vs other, younger vs older, and familiar vs unfamiliar. This article identifies developmental changes for each of the forms of understanding, with impressive early competence in some instances and surprisingly protracted development in others. It is argued that a consideration of preexisting differences in belief provides an important complement to the situational emphases that have characterized theory-of-mind research, extending both the range of beliefs examined and the scope of developmental changes identified.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.