Performance comparison of routing protocols for ad hoc networks

by: F Bertocchi, P Bergamo, G Mazzini, M Zorzi

Global Telecommunications Conference, 2003. GLOBECOM '03. IEEE, Vol. 2 (2003), pp. 1033-1037 Vol.2.

View FullText article

IEEE Explore

Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

Find related articles from these CiteULike users

cebu, zhensong, xian

Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

comparison, no-tag, routing, sensor-network

Abstract

Routing protocols for ad hoc networks are currently a hot research topic and when a lot of metrics are jointly considered, some nontrivial conclusions can be drawn. In this work, we make a comparison of link state, AODV and DSR protocols for two different traffic classes, in a selected environment. The classic Dijkstra is also reported as comparison term. As performance metric, packet delivery fraction, throughput, average delay and energy are considered. We show that AODV and DSR perform well when the network load is moderate, while, if the traffic load is heavy, simple link state outperforms the reactive protocols and becomes a good candidate to be used.

@inproceedings{citeulike:280166, abstract = {Routing protocols for ad hoc networks are currently a hot research topic and when a lot of metrics are jointly considered, some nontrivial conclusions can be drawn. In this work, we make a comparison of link state, AODV and DSR protocols for two different traffic classes, in a selected environment. The classic Dijkstra is also reported as comparison term. As performance metric, packet delivery fraction, throughput, average delay and energy are considered. We show that AODV and DSR perform well when the network load is moderate, while, if the traffic load is heavy, simple link state outperforms the reactive protocols and becomes a good candidate to be used.}, author = {Bertocchi, F. and Bergamo, P. and Mazzini, G. and Zorzi, M. }, citeulike-article-id = {280166}, journal = {Global Telecommunications Conference, 2003. GLOBECOM '03. IEEE}, keywords = {comparison, routing, sensor-network}, pages = {1033--1037 Vol.2}, posted-at = {2006-10-24 22:10:50}, priority = {2}, title = {Performance comparison of routing protocols for ad hoc networks}, url = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs\_all.jsp?arnumber=1258395}, volume = {2}, year = {2003} }

RIS record

TY - CONF ID - citeulike:280166 L3 - citeulike-article-id:280166 TI - Performance comparison of routing protocols for ad hoc networks JF - Global Telecommunications Conference, 2003. GLOBECOM '03. IEEE VL - 2 SP - 1033 EP - 1037 Vol.2 N2 - Routing protocols for ad hoc networks are currently a hot research topic and when a lot of metrics are jointly considered, some nontrivial conclusions can be drawn. In this work, we make a comparison of link state, AODV and DSR protocols for two different traffic classes, in a selected environment. The classic Dijkstra is also reported as comparison term. As performance metric, packet delivery fraction, throughput, average delay and energy are considered. We show that AODV and DSR perform well when the network load is moderate, while, if the traffic load is heavy, simple link state outperforms the reactive protocols and becomes a good candidate to be used. KW - comparison KW - routing KW - sensor-network AU - Bertocchi, F AU - Bergamo, P AU - Mazzini, G AU - Zorzi, M PY - 2003/// UR - http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1258395 ER -

RIS BibTeX